Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCoba Salcedo, Milton Fabian
dc.contributor.authorValencia Ochoa, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorAcevedo Peñaloza, Carlos Humberto
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-11T17:03:44Z
dc.date.available2021-12-11T17:03:44Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.isbn978-88-95608-64-8
dc.identifier.issn2283-9216
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufps.edu.co/handle/ufps/6375
dc.description.abstractA bibliometric analysis of the literature on the subject of Environmental Impact Assessment for a period from 2007 to 2015 was carried out under an expanding and shifting focus. For this purpose, the metadata used was obtained through web of science and analyzed with the Histcite software. The search identified a total of 683 publications related to Environmental Impact Assessment in the period studied, allowing to study the main journals involved in this topic. The country with the highest number of publications was the United States with 88 papers on the subject. On the other hand, the journal with the greatest influence on the subject was Environmental Impact Assessment Review, with 1090 citations, representing the 8.7% of the total citations between 2007 and 2015. Analyzing the evolution of publications per year, there was an increase in research activity on the subject between 2012 and 2014, amounting to 45.6% in those years. According to the type of document from the 683 publications, the 84.6% (578) were articles and 4.4% reviews. These results obtained show an increase in the interest of researchers in the environmental impact assessment topic, which is in line with the climate changes presented on the planet and the global concern to reduce the effects of greenhouse gas, and the better use of natural resources.eng
dc.format.extent06 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherChemical Engineering Transactionsspa
dc.relation.ispartofChemical Engineering Transactions
dc.rights© 2018, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.eng
dc.sourcehttps://www.aidic.it/cet/18/67/programma.htmlspa
dc.titleA bibliometric analysis environmental impact assessment literature: An expanding and shifting focuseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dcterms.referencesAlcamo, Joseph. 2017. “Evaluating the Impacts of Global Environmental Assessments.” Environmental Science and Policy 77(April):268–72. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.009spa
dcterms.referencesBicer, Yusuf and Ibrahim Dincer. 2018. “Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessments and Comparisons of Alternative Fuels for Clean Vehicles.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 132(January):141–57. doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.036spa
dcterms.referencesCardenas, Ibsen C. and Johannes I. M. Halman. 2016. “Coping with Uncertainty in Environmental Impact Assessments: Open Techniques.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 60:24–39. doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.006spa
dcterms.referencesChang, I. Shin, Qimanguli Yilihamu, Jing Wu, Huilei Wu, and Bo Nan. 2017. “Health Impact Assessment in Environmental Impact Assessment in China: Status, Practice and Problems.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 66(April):127–37. doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.007spa
dcterms.referencesElvan, Osman Devrim. 2018. “Analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment Practices and Legislation in Turkey.” Environmental Science and Policy 84(January):1–6. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.02.008spa
dcterms.referencesEnríquez-de-Salamanca, Álvaro. 2018. “Stakeholders’ Manipulation of Environmental Impact Assessment.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 68(July 2017):10–18. doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.003spa
dcterms.referencesGałaś, Slávka et al. 2015. “Environmental Impact Assessment in the Visegrad Group Countries.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 55:11–20. doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.06.006spa
dcterms.referencesHirsch, J. E. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” 102(46):16569–72. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102spa
dcterms.referencesHood, William W. and Concepción S. Wilson. 2001. “The Literature of Bibliometrics , and Informetrics Scientometrics ,.” Scientometrics 52(2):291–314. doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342spa
dcterms.referencesKinney, A. L. 2007. “National Scientific Facilities and Their Science Impact on Nonbiomedical Research.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(46):17943–47. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704416104spa
dcterms.referencesMcCullough, Aoife. 2017. “Environmental Impact Assessments in Developing Countries: We Need to Talk about Politics.” Extractive Industries and Society 4(3):448–52. doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2017.07.002spa
dcterms.referencesMercure, Jean Francois et al. 2018. “Environmental Impact Assessment for Climate Change Policy with the Simulation-Based Integrated Assessment Model E3ME-FTT-GENIE.” Energy Strategy Reviews 20:195– 208. doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.03.003spa
dcterms.referencesNiesner, Jakub, David Jecha, and Petr Stehlík. 2013. “Biogas Upgrading Technologies: State of Art Review in European Region.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 35(January):517–22. doi: 10.3303/CET1335086spa
dcterms.referencesOrellanos Camargo, Ismael A., Guillermo E. Valencia Ochoa, Javier E. Rendón Lafarie, and Marisol Osorio Cardenas. 2017. “Exergoeconomic Analysis of a 30 KW Micro Turbine Cogeneration System Using Hysys and Matlab.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 57:475–80. doi: 10.3303/CET1757080spa
dcterms.referencesRiousset, Pauline, Christian Flachsland, and Martin Kowarsch. 2017. “Global Environmental Assessments: Impact Mechanisms.” Environmental Science and Policy 77:260–67. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.006spa
dcterms.referencesSagastume Gutiérrez, Alexis, Juan J. Cabello Eras, Carlos A. Gaviria, Jo Van Caneghem, and Carlo Vandecasteele. 2017. “Improved Selection of the Functional Unit in Environmental Impact Assessment of Cement.” Journal of Cleaner Production 168:463–73. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.007spa
dcterms.referencesSiluo, Yang. 2017. “Are Scientometrics, Informetrics, and Bibliometrics Different?” 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI2017) (August):12.spa
dcterms.referencesValencia, Guillermo, Erni Ramos, and Lourdes Meriño. 2017. “Energy Planning for Gas Consumption Reduction in a Hot Dip Galvanizing Plant.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 57:697–702.spa
dcterms.referencesValencia Ochoa, Guillermo, Yulineth Cardenas, Emi Ramos, Alexis Morales, and Juan Carlos Campos. 2017. “Energy Saving in Industrial Process Based on the Equivalent Production Method to Calculate Energy Performance Indicators.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 57(September):709–14.spa
dcterms.referencesWilliams, Aled and Kendra Dupuy. 2017. “Deciding over Nature: Corruption and Environmental Impact Assessments.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 65(May):118–24. doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.05.002.spa
dc.publisher.placeItaliaspa
dc.relation.citationeditionVol.67 (2018)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage498spa
dc.relation.citationissue(2018)spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage493spa
dc.relation.citationvolume67spa
dc.relation.citesCobaa, M. F., Valenciab, G. E., & Acevedoc, C. H. (2018). A bibliometric analysis environmental impact assessment literature: an expanding and shifting focus. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 67.
dc.relation.ispartofjournalChemical Engineering Transactionsspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem