Show simple item record

Método multicriterio AHP-FMEA-DA para el análisis de lanzamiento de proyectos NPD

dc.contributor.authorGarcia Aguirre, Pedro Angel
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Domínguez, Luis
dc.contributor.authorLuviano-Cruz, David
dc.contributor.authorSolano Noriega, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorCORDERO DIAZ, MARLING CAROLINA
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-05T16:09:06Z
dc.date.available2024-04-05T16:09:06Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-21
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufps.edu.co/handle/ufps/6837
dc.description.abstractNowadays, new product development (NPD) process, demands the shortest development cycle-time to introduce new products into global markets, likewise, NPD helps firms to offer better products for their consumers, for this reason, different tools and methods are used to assure product launched on time without failures, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a useful tool in risk analysis and multicriteria decision making (MCDM). However, NPD requires an accurate risk assessment to assign the resources and optimise them during the process. This document aims to introduce a modified FMEA method used in combination with Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) and Dimensional Analysis (DA), offering an accurate risk assessment. The AHP-FMEA-DA method intends to help Engineers and NPD Project Managers handling risks identified, besides, to make better decisions to allocate the resources available wisely. Additionally, this document contains a practical example of an NPD project to validate the proposed methodeng
dc.format.extent14 Páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Developmentspa
dc.relation.ispartof2. Pedro Angel Garcia Aguirre* LP-D-DL-C-JS-N-MCC-D. Método multicriterio AHP-FMEA-DA para el análisis de lanzamiento de proyectos NPD. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development. 21 DE DICIEMBRE DEL 2022;
dc.rightsEstá bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)eng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJISD.2023.127971spa
dc.titleMétodo multicriterio AHP-FMEA-DA para el análisis de lanzamiento de proyectos NPDeng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dcterms.referencesAhmed, S., Wallace, K.M. and Blessing, L.T.M. (2003) ‘Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks’, Res. Eng. Des., Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.1–11.spa
dcterms.referencesAIAG(2020) AIAG. [Online]https://www.aiag.org/(Accessed 19 February, 2020). Bridgman, F.D. (1922) ‘Dimensional analysis’, Dimens. Anal., p.2.spa
dcterms.referencesBridgman, F.D. (1922) ‘Dimensional analysis’, Dimens. Anal., p.2.spa
dcterms.referencesChen, W.C., Wang, L.Y. and Lin, M.C. (2015) ‘A hybrid MCDM model for new product development: applied on the Taiwanese LiFePOIndustry’, Math. Probl. Eng., Vol. 2015, January, 15 pages.spa
dcterms.referencesCooper, R.G. (2008) Perspective: The Stage-Gate, pp.213–232.spa
dcterms.referencesDaǧdeviren, M. and Yüksel, I. (2008) ‘Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management’, Inf. Sci (Ny)., Vol. 178, No. 6, pp.1717–1733.spa
dcterms.referencesFahmy, R., Kona, R., Dandu, R., Xie, W., Claycamp, G. and Hoag, S.W. (2012) ‘Quality by design I: application of failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) and plackett–burman design of experiments in the identification of ‘Main factors’in the formulation and process design space for roller-compacted ciprofloxacin hydrochloride immediat’, AAPS PharmSciTech.spa
dcterms.referencesFang, Y-C. and Chyu, C-C. (2014) ‘Evaluation of new product development alternatives considering interrelationships among decision criteria’, J. Multimed., Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.611–617.spa
dcterms.referencesGarcia, P., Perez-Dominguez, L., Luviano-cruz, D., Solano, J., Martinez, E. and Callejas-cuervo, M. (2021) ‘PFDA-fMEA, an integrated method improving FMEA assessment in product design’, Appl. Sci. MDPI, Vol. 11, No. 4, p.1406.spa
dcterms.referencesGhadage, Y.D., Narkhede, B.E. and Raut, R.D. (2020) ‘Risk management of innovative projects using FMEA; A case study’, Int. J. Bus. Excell., Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.70–97.spa
dcterms.referencesGinting, R. and Ishak, A. (2020) ‘An integrated of AHP – QFD methodology for product design: a review’, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, Vol. 8, No. 1, 69–78.spa
dcterms.referencesGupta, M. and Kumar, S. (2019) ‘Design efficiency analysis towards product improvement using DFMA’,2019 8th Int. Conf. Model. Simul. Appl. Optim., pp.1–6.spa
dcterms.referencesHsiang, C.C., Kuan, M.J. and Tzeng, G.H. (2011) ‘Probing performance evaluation for NPD process by using fuzzy MCDM approach’, IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., pp.2304–2310.spa
dcterms.referencesKahan, K.B. (2012) The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, PDMA, Hoboken, New Jersey.spa
dcterms.referencesKaratop, B., Taşkan, B., Adar, E. and Kubat, C. (2021) ‘Decision analysis related to the renewable energy investments in Turkey based on a fuzzy AHP-eDAS-fuzzy FMEA approach’, Comput. Ind. Eng., Vol. 151, January, p.106958.spa
dcterms.referencesKulcsár, E., Csiszér, T. and Abonyi, J. (2020) ‘Pairwise comparison based failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA)’, MethodsX, Vol. 7, May, pp.0–7.spa
dcterms.referencesLiu, H., You, J., Li, P. and Su, Q. (2016) ‘Failure mode and effect analysis under uncertainty : an integrated multiple criteria decision’, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp.1380–1392.spa
dcterms.referencesMzougui, I. and El Felsoufi, Z. (2019) ‘Proposition of a modified FMEA to improve reliability of product’, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 84, pp.1003–1009.spa
dcterms.referencesPérez-Domínguez, L., Alvarado-Iniesta, A., García-Alcaraz, J.L. and Valles-Rosales, D.J. (2018) ‘Intuitionistic fuzzy dimensional analysis for multi-criteria decision making’, Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst., Vol. 15, July, pp.47–70.spa
dcterms.referencesPillay, A. and Wang, J. (2003) ‘Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning’, Elsevier Ocean Eng. Ser., Vol. 7, issue C., pp.149–177.spa
dcterms.referencesSaaty, R.W. (1987) ‘The analythic hierarchy process – what it is and how it is used’, Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, Nos. 3–5, pp.161–176.spa
dcterms.referencesSilva, A.J.V., Dominguez, L.A.P., Gómez, E.M., Alvarado-Iniesta, A. and Olguín, I.J.C.P. (2019) ‘Dimensional analysis under pythagorean fuzzy approach for supplier selection’, Symmetry (Basel)., Vol. 11, No. 3, p.336.spa
dcterms.referencesSotoodeh, K. (2020) ‘Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of pipeline ball valves in the offshore industry’, J. Fail. Anal. Prev., Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.1175–1183.spa
dcterms.referencesTakahashi, M., Anang, Y. and Watanabe, Y. (2021) ‘A safety analysis method for control software in coordination with FMEA and FTA’, Inf., Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.1–31.spa
dcterms.referencesVongvit, R., Kongprasert, N., Fournaise, T. and Collange, T. (2017) ‘Integration of fuzzy-QFD and TRIZ methodology for product development’,3rd Int. Conf. Control. Autom. Robot., Nagoya, Japan, pp.326–329.spa
dcterms.referencesWillis, T., Huston, C. and Pohlkamp, F. (1993) ‘Evaluation measures of just-in-time supplier performance’, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp.1–6.spa
dcterms.referencesZhao, L., Goh, S.H., Chan, Y.H., Yeoh, B.L., Hu, H., Thor, M.H., Tan, A. and Lamet, J. (2018) ‘Prediction of electrical and physical failure analysis success using artificial neural networks’, Proc. Int. Symp. Phys. Fail. Anal. Integr. Circuits, IPFA, Vol. 2018, July, pp.1–5.spa
dcterms.referencesZhou, Q. and Thai, V.V. (2016) ‘Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction’, Saf. Sci., Vol. 83, pp.74–79.spa
dc.identifier.doi/10.1504/IJISD.2023.127971
dc.relation.citationeditionVol.17 N° 1/2 (2023)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage151spa
dc.relation.citationissue1/2 (2023)spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage138spa
dc.relation.citationvolume17spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)spa
dc.subject.proposalNPDeng
dc.subject.proposalnew product developmenteng
dc.subject.proposalFMEAeng
dc.subject.proposalfailure mode and effecteng
dc.subject.proposalanalysiseng
dc.subject.proposalDAeng
dc.subject.proposaldimensional analysiseng
dc.subject.proposalAHPeng
dc.subject.proposalanalytic hierarchy processeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
aguirre-et-al-2022-ahp-fmea-da ...
Size:
403.5Kb
Format:
application/pdf
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)