Show simple item record

On the relationship between technical debt management and process models

dc.contributor.authorRios, Nicolli
dc.contributor.authorFreire, Savio
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Boris
dc.contributor.authorCastellanos, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorCorreal, Dario
dc.contributor.authorMendonca, Manoel
dc.contributor.authorFalessi, Davide
dc.contributor.authorIzurieta, Clemente
dc.contributor.authorSeaman, Carolyn B.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira Spinola, Rodrigo
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T20:11:41Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T20:11:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufps.edu.co/handle/ufps/1464
dc.description.abstract—As technical debt (TD) potentially occurs as a result of poor decisions that affect software development tasks, one might expect that practitioners following different process models, such as agile, hybrid or traditional, will perceive and manage the effects of TD differently. This study investigates the potential relationship between development process models and TD effects and their management by surveying 432 practitioners from software organizations in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and the United States. Results indicate that, although opinions about debt prevention and repayment are the same regardless of the process model, there are differences in how practitioners monitor and feel the effects of TD. Development teams can use our findings to have a clearer view of the possible effects and managerial influence of TD in their projects for each type of process model.eng
dc.format.extent07 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherIEEE Softwarespa
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Software
dc.rights© Copyright 2021 IEEE - All rights reserved. Use of this web site signifies your agreement to the terms and conditions.eng
dc.sourcehttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9352243spa
dc.titleOn the relationship between technical debt management and process modelseng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dcterms.references1.C. Seaman and Y. Guo, "Measuring and monitoring technical debt", Adv. Comput., vol. 82, pp. 25-46, 2011, [online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385512-1.00002-5.spa
dcterms.references2.G. Theocharis, M. Kuhrmann, M. J. Münch and P. Diebold, "Is water-scrum-fall reality? On the use of agile and traditional development practices", Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Product-Focused Softw. Process Improvement, pp. 149-166, 2015.spa
dcterms.references3.N. Rios, R. O. Spínola, M. Mendonça and C. Seaman, "The practitioners’ point of view on the concept of technical debt and its causes and consequences: A design for a global family of industrial surveys and its first results from Brazil", Empirical Softw. Eng. Empirical Softw. Eng., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 3216-3287, 2020.spa
dcterms.references4.N. Rios, M. G. Mendonça and R. O. Spínola, "A tertiary study on technical debt: Types management strategies research trends and base information for practitioners", Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 102, pp. 117-145, Oct. 2018.spa
dcterms.references5.Z. Li, P. Avgeriou and P. Liang, "A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management", J. Syst. Softw., vol. 101, pp. 193-220, Mar. 2015.spa
dcterms.references6.T. Besker, A. Martini and J. Bosch, "Managing architectural technical debt: A unified model and systematic literature review", J. Syst. Softw., vol. 135, pp. 1-16, Jan. 2018.spa
dcterms.references7.T. Besker, H. Ghanbari, A. Martini and J. Bosch, "The influence of Technical Debt on software developer morale", J. Syst. Softw., vol. 167, pp. 110,586, Sept. 2020.spa
dcterms.references8.P. Devanbu, T. Zimmermann and C. Bird, "Belief & evidence in empirical software engineering", Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Softw. Eng. (ICSE), pp. 108-119, 2016.spa
dcterms.references9.S. McConnell, Technical debt” 10x Software Development Blog, 2008, [online] Available: https://www.construx.com/resources/whitepaper-managing-technical-debt/.spa
dcterms.references10.W. Webber, A. Moffat and J. Zobel, "A similarity measure for indefinite rankings", ACM Trans. Off. Int. Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, 2010.spa
dcterms.references11.N. Rios, R. O. Spínola, M. Mendonça and C. Seaman, "Supporting analysis of technical debt causes and effects with cross-company probabilistic cause-effect diagrams", Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Tech. Debt, pp. 3-12, 2019.spa
dcterms.references12.S. Freire et al., "Surveying software practitioners on technical debt payment practices and reasons for not paying off debt items", Proc. Eval. Assessment Softw. Eng., pp. 210-219, 2020.spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2021.3058652
dc.publisher.placeEstados Unidosspa
dc.relation.citationeditionVol.38 No.5.(2021)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage7spa
dc.relation.citationissue5(2021)spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume38spa
dc.relation.citesRios, N., Freire, S., Pérez, B., Castellanos, C., Correal, D., Mendonca, M., ... & Spinola, R. O. (2021). On the Relationship Between Technical Debt Management and Process Models. IEEE Software.
dc.relation.ispartofjournalIEEE Softwarespa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)spa
dc.subject.proposaltechnical debteng
dc.subject.proposaleffects of technical debteng
dc.subject.proposaltechnical debt managementeng
dc.subject.proposalprocess modelseng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
On the relationship between ...
Size:
573.4Kb
Format:
application/pdf
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record