Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPrada Botia, Gaudy Carolina
dc.contributor.authorSalamanca Jaimes, E
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, P H
dc.contributor.authorReis, G
dc.contributor.authorCampos Rubio, J C
dc.contributor.authorVolpini Lana, M R
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T17:02:42Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T17:02:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufps.edu.co/handle/ufps/1092
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to present manufacturing methodologies through reverse engineering of socket design for a transtibial amputee, bearing in mind that it is a customized product. In addition, the traditional manufacturing process will be arrived at in comparison with the model proposed. In this sense, this document proposes a new practical approach to modeling the contact interface, i.e. the prosthetic socket and the skin, and thus making a more functional prosthesis by helping people to visibly improve their quality of life.eng
dc.format.extent07 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherJournal of Physics: Conference Seriesspa
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Physics: Conference Series
dc.rights© Copyright 2021 IOP Publishingeng
dc.sourcehttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012016/metaspa
dc.titleComparison of a transtibial socket design obtained by additive manufacturing and reverse engineering and a traditional modeleng
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dcterms.referencesWorld Health Organization (WHO) 2013 World health statistics 2013: A wealth of information on global public health (Switzerland: World Health Organization) 109-115spa
dcterms.referencesNieto J, Carvajal M, Urriolagoitia G, Hernández H and Minor A 2003 Determinación de esfuerzos en el socket de una prótesis transtibial por medio del método del elemento finito Acta Ortopédica Mexicana 17 89-93spa
dcterms.referencesChristoph R, Muñoz R and Hernández A 2016 Manufactura aditiva Realidad y Reflexión 43 98-109spa
dcterms.referencesWong K and Hernandez A 2012 A review of additive manufacturing ISRN Mechanical Engineering 2012 1-10spa
dcterms.referencesMoussa A and Bashir M 2017 Additive manufacturing: A new industrial revolution – A review Journal of Scientific Achievement 2 19-31spa
dcterms.referencesV-Niño E D, Endrino J L, Estupiñan H A, Pérez B and Díaz A 2016 Caracterización microscópica de texturas superficiales fabricadas aditivamente mediante estereolitografía láser Respuestas 21 37-47spa
dcterms.referencesMartinez A, González O A and Martínez E 2017 Evaluación de las propiedades tribológicas de materiales compuestos de matriz metálica (MMCs) procesados por técnicas de fabricación aditiva con haz láser (SLM) Revista UIS Ingeniería 16 101-114spa
dcterms.referencesSmith D 2004 Notes from the medical director: The knee disarticulation: It’s better when it’s better and it’s not when it’s not inMotion 14 56-62spa
dcterms.referencesPirouzi G, Osman A, Eshraghi A, Ali S, Gholizadeh H and Wan W 2014 Review of the socket design and interface pressure measurement for transtibial prosthesis Scientific World Journal 2014 1-9spa
dcterms.referencesKumar P and Choudhury A 2011 Analysis of transtibial prosthetic socket materials using finite element method Biomedical Science and Engineering 4 762-768spa
dcterms.referencesWilliams J, Adewunmi A, Schek R, Flanagan C, Krebsbach P, Feinberg S, Hollister S and Dasb S 2005 Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering Biomaterials 26 4817-4827spa
dcterms.referencesSeyed S, Gharehkhani S, Mehrali M, Yarmand H, Cornelis H, Kadri N and Abu N 2015 A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing Sci Technol Adv Mater 16 033502spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1126/1/012016
dc.publisher.placeReino Unidospa
dc.relation.citationeditionVol.1126 No.1.(2018)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage7spa
dc.relation.citationissue1(2018)spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume1126spa
dc.relation.citesJaimes, E. S., Botía, G. P., Rodrigues, P. H., Reis, G., Rubio, J. C., & Lana, M. V. (2018, November). Comparison of a transtibial socket design obtained by additive manufacturing and reverse engineering and a traditional model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1126, No. 1, p. 012016). IOP Publishing.
dc.relation.ispartofjournalJournal of Physics: Conference Seriesspa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.rights.creativecommonsAtribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0)spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
oaire.accessrightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem